Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IAdea
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:25, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- IAdea (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested speedy deletion, not mine.
Unambiguous advertisement (...a company in the digital signage industry known for pioneering development of industrial-grade media player appliances and the digital signboard. IAdea devices are supported by the most number of top digital signage software solutions in the market.) for yet another non-notable tech business.
References are all to press releases, Top 100 lists, and a BitTorrent related blog; article currently fails the business notability guideline, and I see nothing better. Only claim to minimal significance is that it sells the world's first integrated circuit running the peer-to-peer BitTorrent network protocol for consumer devices. The technology enables efficient distribution of large video files using simple hardware devices. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:45, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
- Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable sources; tons of press releases though. -- Whpq (talk) 19:27, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No significant coverage anywhere. Note: There are currently similar deletion discussions for Digital signage product comparison and Sony Ziris. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 23:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- At least their BitTorrent hardware was noted in PC Magazine. [1] FuFoFuEd (talk) 06:28, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That reads like a press release rehash. -- Whpq (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. That seems to be all the independent coverage, and it seems the line of products noted in that 2007 news story either didn't materialize or is stuff nobody cared about afterwards. [2] FuFoFuEd (talk) 20:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That reads like a press release rehash. -- Whpq (talk) 10:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.